William L. Barton v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida

412 F.2d 229
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 24, 1969·No. 27185·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

The basis of this appeal is asserted error in the conclusion of the district *230 court, on a petition for writ of habeas corpus, that Florida must afford its petitioner-prisoner a new trial because of an absence of due process of law in his state trial. The holding rested on a denial of Sixth Amendment rights to compulsory process and the affective assistance of counsel through the suppression of witnesses by the sheriff of Pinel-las County, Florida.

The findings of fact entered by the district court after a full evidentiary hearing as to the suppression of material witnesses are amply supported by the record. The conclusions of law are likewise supported. Cf. Brady v. Maryland, 1963, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215; Giles v. Maryland, 1967, 386 U.S. 66, 87 S.Ct. 793, 17 L.Ed.2d 737; Jackson v. Wainwright, 5 Cir., 1968, 390 F.2d 288; Barbee v. Warden, Md. Penitentiary, 4 Cir., 1964, 331 F.2d 842.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William L. Barton v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, 412 F.2d 229 (5th Cir. 1969).

412 F.2d 229 (William L. Barton v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Giles v. Maryland
386 U.S. 66 (Supreme Court, 1967)
William B. Barbee v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
331 F.2d 842 (Fourth Circuit, 1964)