William Korioth WTK Development, LLC Kona Coast LLC Guadalupe 306, LP And Guadalupe 306 GP, LLC v. Whitewater Investment Partners, LLC Oxbow Land Partners, LLC Hideout on the Horseshoe, LLC Whitewater Sports, LLC And Kona Coast Venture, LTD
This text of William Korioth WTK Development, LLC Kona Coast LLC Guadalupe 306, LP And Guadalupe 306 GP, LLC v. Whitewater Investment Partners, LLC Oxbow Land Partners, LLC Hideout on the Horseshoe, LLC Whitewater Sports, LLC And Kona Coast Venture, LTD (William Korioth WTK Development, LLC Kona Coast LLC Guadalupe 306, LP And Guadalupe 306 GP, LLC v. Whitewater Investment Partners, LLC Oxbow Land Partners, LLC Hideout on the Horseshoe, LLC Whitewater Sports, LLC And Kona Coast Venture, LTD) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-22-00683-CV
William Korioth; WTK Development, LLC; Kona Coast LLC; Guadalupe 306, LP; and Guadalupe 306 GP, LLC, Appellants
v.
Whitewater Investment Partners, LLC; Oxbow Land Partners, LLC; Hideout on the Horseshoe, LLC; Whitewater Sports, LLC; and Kona Coast Venture, LTD, Appellees
FROM THE 274TH DISTRICT COURT OF COMAL COUNTY NO. C2021-0823C, THE HONORABLE STEPHANIE BASCON, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellants William Korioth; WTK Development, LLC; Kona Coast LLC;
Guadalupe 306, LP; and Guadalupe 306 GP, LLC, have filed a petition for permissive appeal
seeking to challenge an interlocutory order denying their motion for summary judgment.
(Appellees’ cross motion for summary judgment was also denied, and they
include conditional cross points in their brief, but they generally oppose the petition for
permissive appeal.)
To be entitled to a permissive appeal from an interlocutory order that would
not otherwise be appealable, the requesting party must establish that (1) the order to be
appealed involves a “controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial ground for
difference of opinion” and (2) an immediate appeal from the order “may materially advance the ultimate termination of the litigation.” Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code
§ 51.014(d); see Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(e)(4); Tex. R. Civ. P. 168. Because we conclude that
the petition fails to establish each requirement of Rule 28.3(e)(4), we deny the petition
for permissive appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 28.3(e)(4).
__________________________________________ Edward Smith, Justice
Before Justices Baker, Smith, and Jones*
Filed: May 2, 2023
*Before J. Woodfin Jones, Chief Justice (Retired), Third Court of Appeals, sitting by assignment. See Tex. Gov’t Code § 74.003(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Korioth WTK Development, LLC Kona Coast LLC Guadalupe 306, LP And Guadalupe 306 GP, LLC v. Whitewater Investment Partners, LLC Oxbow Land Partners, LLC Hideout on the Horseshoe, LLC Whitewater Sports, LLC And Kona Coast Venture, LTD, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-korioth-wtk-development-llc-kona-coast-llc-guadalupe-306-lp-and-texapp-2023.