William Kiper v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., e

534 F. App'x 266
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided July 5, 2013·No. 12-20790·Unpublished·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

The judgment of the district court is affirmed. The difficulties of the Plaintiff do not support a legal claim against the defendants. No defect is alleged in the foreclosure and sale of the Skyline Lane property. No breach of contract legal claim is alleged on behalf of himself or his wife. And no plausible tort claim is alleged. This court has read the opinions of the district court dated August 2, 2012 and November 6, 2012 and finds no error there, nor has any claimed error been briefed as is required.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Kiper v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., e, 534 F. App'x 266 (5th Cir. 2013).

534 F. App'x 266 (William Kiper v. BAC Home Loans Servicing, L.P., e) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related