William Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.

324 F. App'x 537
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedMay 11, 2009
Docket08-1979
StatusUnpublished

This text of 324 F. App'x 537 (William Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Bd.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Jones v. Merit Systems Protection Bd., 324 F. App'x 537 (8th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

After the district court 1 dismissed William Jones’s complaint against the United States Merit Systems Protection Board for lack of subject matter jurisdiction, he brought this appeal. We agree with the district court that it lacked subject matter jurisdiction for the reasons explained in the court’s thorough memorandum opinion and order, and we conclude that in these circumstances, the district court did not abuse its discretion in declining to transfer the action to the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit. See LeMay v. U.S. Postal Serv., 450 F.3d 797, 799 (8th Cir.2006) (dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction reviewed de novo); United States v. Hull, 419 F.3d 762, 768 (8th Cir.2005) (refusal to transfer reviewed for abuse of discretion).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

1

. The Honorable Laurie Smith Camp, United States District Judge for the District of Nebraska.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
324 F. App'x 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-jones-v-merit-systems-protection-bd-ca8-2009.