William Jones v. Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation, Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Thomas Howe

399 F.2d 637, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5684
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 28, 1968
Docket21428_1
StatusPublished

This text of 399 F.2d 637 (William Jones v. Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation, Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Thomas Howe) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Jones v. Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation, Great Northern Railway Company, a Corporation v. Thomas Howe, 399 F.2d 637, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5684 (9th Cir. 1968).

Opinion

399 F.2d 637

William JONES, Appellant,
v.
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Appellee.
GREAT NORTHERN RAILWAY COMPANY, a corporation, Appellant.
v.
Thomas HOWE, Appellee.

Nos. 21428, 21428A.

United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit.

Aug. 28, 1968.

Myron E. Pitch (argued), of Weir, Gough & Booth, Edwin S. Booth (argued), Helena, Mont., Jardine, Stephenson, Blewett & Weaver, Great Falls, Mont., for appellant.

Douglas Anderson (argued), of Francisco & Sherman, Conrad, Mont., John W. Bonner (argued), Helena, Mont., for appellee.

Before MERRILL and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and CRARY, District judge.1

PER CURIAM:

Jones and Howe brought an action against Great Northern Railway Company in the Montana state courts for personal injuries sustained by them in a crossing accident. The action was removed to the federal court by reason of diversity of citizenship. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the two plaintiffs. On a motion by Great Northern for judgment notwithstanding the verdict, the trial court granted the motion as to Jones, who was the driver of the vehicle in which the two plaintiffs were riding. Jones appeals from the judgment against him. The trial court denied the motion as to Howe, who was a passenger in that vehicle. Great Northern appeals from Howe's judgment against it. All of the questions raised are questions of Montana law. They were carefully and fully considered by the district judge in a detailed opinion. Our review of the evidence and of the Montana authorities convinces us that all questions presented were correctly decided by the district judge.

Affirmed.

1

Honorable E. AVERY CRARY, United States District Judge, Central District of California, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Jones v. Great Northern Railway Co.
399 F.2d 637 (Ninth Circuit, 1968)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
399 F.2d 637, 1968 U.S. App. LEXIS 5684, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-jones-v-great-northern-railway-company-a-c-ca9-1968.