William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas
This text of William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas (William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN
NO. 03-24-00105-CR
William Jason Perez, Appellant
v.
The State of Texas, Appellee
FROM THE 207TH DISTRICT COURT OF HAYS COUNTY NO. CR-23-0118-B, THE HONORABLE TRACIE WRIGHT-RENEAU, JUDGE PRESIDING
MEMORANDUM OPINION
A jury found Appellant William Jason Perez guilty of second-degree sexual
assault and assessed punishment at ten-years’ imprisonment and assessed a $10,000 fine. See
Tex. Penal Code §§ 12.33; 22.011(a)(1), (f). On the jury’s recommendation, the trial court
suspended his sentence and placed him on community supervision for ten years. See Tex. Code
Crim. Proc. art. 42A.053. He appeals.
Appellant’s court-appointed attorney has filed a motion to withdraw as counsel
along with a brief concluding that the appeal is frivolous and presents no arguably meritorious
issues. The brief meets the requirements of Anders v. California by presenting a professional
evaluation of the record demonstrating why there are no arguable grounds to be advanced. See
386 U.S. 738, 744 (1967); Garner v. State, 300 S.W.3d 763, 766 (Tex. Crim. App. 2009); see
also Penson v. Ohio, 488 U.S. 75, 81–82 (1988). Appellant’s counsel has certified to this Court
that he sent copies of the motion and brief to appellant, advised appellant of his right to examine the appellate record and file a pro se response, and provided a copy of the appellate record. See
Kelly v. State, 436 S.W.3d 313, 319–20 (Tex. Crim. App. 2014); see also Anders, 386 U.S.
at 744.
We have conducted an independent review of the record—including the record
of the trial proceedings below and appellate counsel’s brief—and find no reversible error. See
Anders, 386 U.S. at 744; Garner, 300 S.W.3d at 766; Bledsoe v. State, 178 S.W.3d 824, 826–27
(Tex. Crim. App. 2005). We agree with counsel that the record presents no arguably meritorious
grounds for review and that the appeal is frivolous.
We affirm the judgment and grant counsel’s motion to withdraw.
__________________________________________ Darlene Byrne, Chief Justice
Before Chief Justice Byrne, Justices Triana and Kelly
Affirmed
Filed: August 30, 2024
Do Not Publish
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Jason Perez v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-jason-perez-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.