William Jackson v. Doris Jackson
This text of William Jackson v. Doris Jackson (William Jackson v. Doris Jackson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
USCA11 Case: 23-13705 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/04/2024 Page: 1 of 2
[DO NOT PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
____________________
No. 23-13705 Non-Argument Calendar ____________________
WILLIAM JACKSON, Plaintiff-Appellant, versus DORIS CHAPPELL JACKSON,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-04174-ELR ____________________ USCA11 Case: 23-13705 Document: 7-1 Date Filed: 01/04/2024 Page: 2 of 2
2 Opinion of the Court 23-13705
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and BRASHER, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM: This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdic- tion. William Jackson, proceeding pro se, appeals from the district court’s order remanding to state court a divorce action. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports &Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Hu- mana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001). No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Jackson v. Doris Jackson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-jackson-v-doris-jackson-ca11-2024.