William J. Vickers v. Annie D. Thomas
Opinion
Supreme Court of Florida
No. SC18-270
WILLIAM J. VICKERS,
Petitioner,
vs.
ANNIE D. THOMAS,
Respondent.
November 29, 2018
PER CURIAM.
We initially accepted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fifth District Court of Appeal in Vickers v. Thomas, 237 So. 3d 412 (Fla. 5th DCA 2017), based on express and direct conflict. See art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. After further consideration and hearing oral argument, we exercise our discretion to discharge jurisdiction. Accordingly, we hereby discharge jurisdiction and dismiss this review proceeding.
It is so ordered.
CANADY, C.J., and PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, POLSTON, LABARGA, and LAWSON, JJ., concur.
NO MOTION FOR REHEARING WILL BE ALLOWED.
Application for Review of the Decision of the District Court of Appeal – Direct Conflict of Decisions
Fifth District - Case No. 5D15-3610 (Seminole County)
Angela C. Flowers of Kubicki Draper, P.A., Ocala, Florida, for Petitioner
Jeffrey M. Byrd and Heather A. Trombly of Jeffrey M. Byrd, P.A., Orlando, Florida,
for Respondent
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William J. Vickers v. Annie D. Thomas (William J. Vickers v. Annie D. Thomas) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.