William J. Matheson & Co. v. United States

65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York·Decided January 2, 1895·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This importation is an acid prepared from coal tar, used in making coal-tar colors. By paragraph 19 of the tariff act of 1890, “all preparations of coal tar, not colors or dyes, not specially provided for,” were made subject to a duty; and by paragraph 473 “acids used for medicinal, chemical, or manufacturing purposes” were free. If this acid had not been a preparation of coal tar, it would have been free. But it is not with colors and dyes in the specific exception of paragraph 19, nor specially provided for as a preparation of coal tar elsewhere, or more specially included among acids than it is there among coal-tar preparations. The wording of paragraph 19 seems to imply that, exceptions of preparations of coal tar elsewhere would be made quite plain. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William J. Matheson & Co. v. United States, 65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994 (circtsdny 1895).

65 F. 422 (William J. Matheson & Co. v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schulze-Berge v. United States
66 F. 748 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1895)