William J. Matheson & Co. v. United States

65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedJanuary 2, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 65 F. 422 (William J. Matheson & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William J. Matheson & Co. v. United States, 65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994 (circtsdny 1895).

Opinion

WHEELER, District Judge.

This importation is an acid prepared from coal tar, used in making coal-tar colors. By paragraph 19 of the tariff act of 1890, “all preparations of coal tar, not colors or dyes, not specially provided for,” were made subject to a duty; and by paragraph 473 “acids used for medicinal, chemical, or manufacturing purposes” were free. If this acid had not been a preparation of coal tar, it would have been free. But it is not with colors and dyes in the specific exception of paragraph 19, nor specially provided for as a preparation of coal tar elsewhere, or more specially included among acids than it is there among coal-tar preparations. The wording of paragraph 19 seems to imply that, exceptions of preparations of coal tar elsewhere would be made quite plain. Decision affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Schulze-Berge v. United States
66 F. 748 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1895)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
65 F. 422, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 2994, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-j-matheson-co-v-united-states-circtsdny-1895.