William J. Jenack Estate Appraisers & Auctioneers, Inc. v. Rabizadeh
This text of 98 A.D.3d 1037 (William J. Jenack Estate Appraisers & Auctioneers, Inc. v. Rabizadeh) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1038]*1038In an action to recover damages for breach of contract, the defendant appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Orange County (Ritter, J.), dated November 16, 2009, which denied his motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint and granted the plaintiffs cross motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability, and (2) an interlocutory judgment of the same court entered January 12, 2010, which, upon the order, is in favor of the plaintiff and against him on the issue of liability.
Ordered that the appeals are dismissed, without costs or disbursements.
The appeals from the order and the interlocutory judgment must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of the final judgment in the action (see Matter of Aho, 39 NY2d 241, 248 [1976]). The issues raised on the appeals from the order and the interlocutory judgment are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the final judgment (see CPLR 5501 [a] [1]; William J. Jenack Estate Appraisers & Auctioneers, Inc. v Rabizadeh, 98 AD3d —, 2012 NY Slip Op 06211 [2012] [decided herewith]). Skelos, J.P., Leventhal, Belen and Roman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
98 A.D.3d 1037, 950 N.Y.S.2d 911, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-j-jenack-estate-appraisers-auctioneers-inc-v-rabizadeh-nyappdiv-2012.