William J. Hibler v. Erik Garza

Court of Appeals of Texas

William J. Hibler v. Erik Garza

DecidedApril 5, 2012

Docket14-11-00942-CV

StatusPublished

This text of William J. Hibler v. Erik Garza (William J. Hibler v. Erik Garza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William J. Hibler v. Erik Garza, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

Pincite

Opinion

Order filed April 5, 2012.

In The

Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________

NO. 14-11-00942-CV ____________

WILLIAM J. HIBLER, Appellant

V.

ERIK GARZA, Appellee

On Appeal from the 133rd District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2011-30808

ORDER

Appellant’s brief was filed on February 13, 2012. On March 21, 2012, appellee filed a motion to strike. The Court agrees that appellant has not properly presented this cause in his brief on file and grants the motion.

Appellant failed to substantially comply with Rule 38 of the Texas Rules of Appellate procedure. In particular, appellant has failed to provide adequate citations to the record and to authority. Tex. R. App. P. 38.1(f), (h). Accordingly, pursuant to Rule 38.9(b), the court orders appellant to rebrief. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.9(b). Appellant’s amended brief is due May 7, 2012, and appellee’s responsive brief shall be due 30 days after appellant’s revised brief is filed.

PER CURIAM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI