William J. Bumgarder v. Keene Corporation, Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc.
This text of 593 F.2d 572 (William J. Bumgarder v. Keene Corporation, Forty-Eight Insulation, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Invoking diversity jurisdiction, William Bumgarder, a resident of North Carolina, sued several foreign corporations in the district court. His complaint was dismissed upon a finding that South Carolina’s “door-closing” statute, S.C. Code § 15-5-150, barred the action. Bumgarder appeals, and we affirm.
The district court properly determined that Bumgarder’s case did not fall within the terms of § 15-5-150, for he is neither a resident of South Carolina, nor did his cause of action against Keene or Forty-Eight arise within the state. Although Bumgarder relies upon Szantay v. Beech Aircraft Corp., 349 F.2d 60 (4th Cir. 1965), we do not think countervailing federal considerations required the district court to entertain his suit and to ignore the South Carolina statute. Bumgarder could have maintained his suit in North Carolina, the place where he lived, worked and was allegedly exposed to asbestos. Because there was an alternate forum to the South Carolina court where Bumgarder could gain full relief, we find Szantay does not apply.
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
593 F.2d 572, 1979 U.S. App. LEXIS 16382, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-j-bumgarder-v-keene-corporation-forty-eight-insulation-inc-ca4-1979.