William Iselin & Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
508 N.E.2d 932, 69 N.Y.2d 908, 516 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16354
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order modified, with costs to defendant, by denying plaintiff’s cross motion to dismiss the fourth, fifth and sixth affirmative defenses and, as so modified, affirmed for the reasons stated in the dissenting in part opinion by Justice Leonard H. Sandler at the Appellate Division (117 AD2d 86, 93-96). Certified question answered in the negative.
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa. Taking no part: Judge Alexander.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Iselin & Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance, 508 N.E.2d 932, 69 N.Y.2d 908, 516 N.Y.S.2d 198, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 16354 (N.Y. 1987).
508 N.E.2d 932 (William Iselin & Co. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
New York & Presbyterian Hospital v. Travelers Property Casualty Insurance
37 A.D.3d 683 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Interbank of New York v. Fleet Bank
189 Misc. 2d 20 (Civil Court of the City of New York, 2001)
French American Banking Corp. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A., and Fireman's Fund Insurance Co., Fireman's Fund Insurance Co.
925 F.2d 603 (Second Circuit, 1991)
French American Banking Corp. v. Flota Mercante Grancolombiana, S.A.
752 F. Supp. 83 (S.D. New York, 1990)
National City Bank of Minneapolis v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co.
447 N.W.2d 171 (Supreme Court of Minnesota, 1989)