William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided October 30, 2019·No. 19-0014·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D19-14

WILLIAM HURST PETERS III, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.

October 30, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.

WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

William Hurst Peters III, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida (William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.