William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida
Opinion
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA
No. 1D19-14
WILLIAM HURST PETERS III, Petitioner, v.
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Respondent.
Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel— Original Jurisdiction.
October 30, 2019
PER CURIAM.
The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the merits.
WOLF, ROBERTS, and ROWE, JJ., concur.
Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.
William Hurst Peters III, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida (William Hurst Peters III v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.