William Horace Walker v. State

Opinion

."X. ^cc*.\\ < Ko,oe

W\^ 1H .

J

ry.

y Please. cCctcL+^L.5 J

c}c^u

X Oc^cfly ^ vn

cowrv s ]±

\n L{

f"

J '

ty\\

m

-|t> td no-h

* So

SllvMq -jo char at, lr\Tz> a-S> y-er• ^t-

fio co cjv^ s p

X- .JjJ«

iTx>fh M \l X )

<k

%

bud

/ bu

\Jra o_es nor'

V-oh

1,

M

in

X f-

/

/ ^£ poems Dfp if

}

h>he J

A

•fa a.

pfa

jCe*P-jyi l\ t /0&**

j O ^ ?

-fi Livn jocls he

^

f-

doni

£lhcI in fl ty cka/iaea M&isi "£■ was* n/l. fayh'ty,

.

<j...B/oa/s_

q

a

f t

(r hj/ $oul} cowrie

of -f d?c

Oh \z vo fauj ho

\

X

n

X-

r

. Mi/

l

M\ICMl_Jy^\^\\\ lepUaJcJ if you do < A /i$3 fcr^ X jll W^ Me faA \lo\A

M

-..

f PRIVILEGED OFFENDER M lAlIl NOT INSPECTED BY TEX DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE- CORRECT1, OVAL INSTITUTIONS niVIMON