William Hightower v. United States

D.C. Circuit

William Hightower v. United States

193 F.2d 40, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 420, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 29, 1951

Docket10920

StatusPublished

This text of 193 F.2d 40 (William Hightower v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Hightower v. United States, 193 F.2d 40, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 420, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

Pincite

Opinion

193 F.2d 40

90 U.S.App.D.C. 420

William HIGHTOWER, Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10920.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 14, 1951.
Decided Nov. 29, 1951.

Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D.C., with whom Joseph Asper, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, and John D. Lane and Frank H. Strickler, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee. Charles M. Irelan, appointed U.S. Atty. subsequent to the argument in this case, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. United States v. Carignan, 72 S.Ct. 97; Tyler v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C.- , 193 F.2d 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI