William Hightower v. United States

193 F.2d 40, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 420, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit·Decided November 29, 1951·No. 10920·Published

Opinion

193 F.2d 40

90 U.S.App.D.C. 420

William HIGHTOWER, Appellant
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Appellee.

No. 10920.

United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit.

Argued June 14, 1951.
Decided Nov. 29, 1951.

Saul G. Lichtenberg, Washington, D.C., with whom Joseph Asper, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellant.

Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., with whom George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty., at the time the brief was filed, and John D. Lane and Frank H. Strickler, Asst. U.S. Attys., all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief for appellee. Charles M. Irelan, appointed U.S. Atty. subsequent to the argument in this case, Washington, D.C., also entered an appearance for appellee.

Before EDGERTON, CLARK, and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

The judgment is affirmed. United States v. Carignan, 72 S.Ct. 97; Tyler v. United States, 89 U.S.App.D.C.- , 193 F.2d 24.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Hightower v. United States, 193 F.2d 40, 90 U.S. App. D.C. 420, 1951 U.S. App. LEXIS 2861 (D.C. Cir. 1951).

193 F.2d 40 (William Hightower v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Carignan
342 U.S. 36 (Supreme Court, 1951)
Tyler v. United States
193 F.2d 24 (D.C. Circuit, 1952)