William Hehl v. United States

D.C. Circuit

William Hehl v. United States

288 F.2d 130

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedNovember 30, 1960

Docket15711

StatusPublished

This text of 288 F.2d 130 (William Hehl v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Hehl v. United States, 288 F.2d 130 (D.C. Cir. 1960).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The District Court, sitting without a jury, found the appellant guilty of sodomy. 1 Motions for acquittal and for a new trial were denied, and the appellant was sentenced to a term of six months to three years. On this appeal he makes several claims as to the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Government. We have examined both the record and the briefs and find no error affecting substantial rights of the accused.

Affirmed.

1

. 62 Stat. 347 (1948), D.C.Code § 22-3502 (1951).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The District Court, sitting without a jury, found the appellant guilty of sodomy. 1 Motions for acquittal and for a new trial were denied, and the appellant was sentenced to a term of six months to three years. On this appeal he makes several claims as to the sufficiency of the evidence presented by the Government. We have examined both the record and the briefs and find no error affecting substantial rights of the accused.

Affirmed.

1

. 62 Stat. 347 (1948), D.C.Code § 22-3502 (1951).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

288 F.2d 130, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-hehl-v-united-states-cadc-1960.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack