William Harold Masterson v. the State of Texas

Court of Appeals of Texas

William Harold Masterson v. the State of Texas

DecidedOctober 31, 2024

Docket03-23-00560-CR

StatusPublished

This text of William Harold Masterson v. the State of Texas (William Harold Masterson v. the State of Texas) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Harold Masterson v. the State of Texas, (Tex. Ct. App. 2024).

Pincite

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2024

NO. 03-23-00560-CR

William Harold Masterson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00561-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00562-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00563-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00564-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 31, 2024

NO. 03-23-00560-CR

William Harold Masterson, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00561-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00562-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00563-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made. TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-23-00564-CR

APPEAL FROM THE 26TH DISTRICT COURT OF WILLIAMSON COUNTY BEFORE JUSTICES BAKER, TRIANA, AND KELLY AFFIRMED -- OPINION BY JUSTICE KELLY

This is an appeal from the judgment of conviction entered by the trial court. Having reviewed the

record and the parties’ arguments, the Court holds that there was no reversible error in the

judgment. Therefore, the Court affirms the trial court’s judgment of conviction. Because appellant

is indigent and unable to pay costs, no adjudication of costs is made.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

William Harold Masterson v. the State of Texas, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-harold-masterson-v-the-state-of-texas-texapp-2024.