William H. Tart v. United States

D.C. Circuit

William H. Tart v. United States

263 F.2d 272

CourtCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 1959

Docket14567_1

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 263 F.2d 272 (William H. Tart v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William H. Tart v. United States, 263 F.2d 272 (D.C. Cir. 1959).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for violation of the narcotic laws, 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a) (Supp. V, 1958). The appeal questions the admissibility in evidence of certain articles claimed to have been procured in an unlawful manner by a member of the Metropolitan Police Department. Upon consideration of uncontradicted testimony as to the relevant circumstances we conclude that the articles in question were not obtained by means of any unlawful conduct on the part of the officer.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal is from a judgment of conviction for violation of the narcotic laws, 26 U.S.C. § 4744(a) (Supp. V, 1958). The appeal questions the admissibility in evidence of certain articles claimed to have been procured in an unlawful manner by a member of the Metropolitan Police Department. Upon consideration of uncontradicted testimony as to the relevant circumstances we conclude that the articles in question were not obtained by means of any unlawful conduct on the part of the officer.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

263 F.2d 272, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-h-tart-v-united-states-cadc-1959.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack