William H. Jackson v. United States

Fourth Circuit

William H. Jackson v. United States

231 F.2d 653, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedApril 11, 1956

Docket7167_1

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 231 F.2d 653 (William H. Jackson v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William H. Jackson v. United States, 231 F.2d 653, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436 (4th Cir. 1956).

Pincite

Opinion

PEB CUBIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Similar appeals by the same prisoner have been before us on prior occasions. See Jackson v. United States, 4 Cir., 214 F.2d 485, and Jackson v. United States, 4 Cir., 224 F.2d 556. His contention now is that at the time of his sentence he was not notified of the right of appeal by the trial judge. Buie 37(a) (2) of the Buies of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., has no application to the case because sentence was not im* posed after trial, but upon a plea of guilty, and defendant was represented by counsel. The facts are fully set forth in the orders of the court below dated December 21, 1955 and December 2, 1955. The motion was frivolous and was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PEB CUBIAM.

This is an appeal from an order denying a motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. Similar appeals by the same prisoner have been before us on prior occasions. See Jackson v. United States, 4 Cir., 214 F.2d 485, and Jackson v. United States, 4 Cir., 224 F.2d 556. His contention now is that at the time of his sentence he was not notified of the right of appeal by the trial judge. Buie 37(a) (2) of the Buies of Criminal Procedure, 18 U.S.C., has no application to the case because sentence was not im* posed after trial, but upon a plea of guilty, and defendant was represented by counsel. The facts are fully set forth in the orders of the court below dated December 21, 1955 and December 2, 1955. The motion was frivolous and was properly denied.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

231 F.2d 653, 1956 U.S. App. LEXIS 3436, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-h-jackson-v-united-states-ca4-1956.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack