William H. Hoff v. Angel Wilson, President, Third World Interim, Incorporated Third World Interim, Incorporated

73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40381, 1995 WL 761055
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit
DecidedDecember 27, 1995
Docket95-2596
StatusPublished

This text of 73 F.3d 357 (William H. Hoff v. Angel Wilson, President, Third World Interim, Incorporated Third World Interim, Incorporated) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William H. Hoff v. Angel Wilson, President, Third World Interim, Incorporated Third World Interim, Incorporated, 73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40381, 1995 WL 761055 (3d Cir. 1995).

Opinion

73 F.3d 357
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William H. HOFF, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Angel WILSON, President, Third World Interim, Incorporated;
Third World Interim, Incorporated, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 95-2596.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided Dec. 27, 1995.

William H. Hoff, Appellant Pro Se. Marc David Stern, AMERICAN JEWISH CONGRESS, New York, New York, for Appellees.

Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge, granting summary judgment in favor of Defendants, and dismissing Appellant's employment discrimination action pursuant to Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C.A. Sec. 2000e (West 1994). We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Hoff v. Wilson, No. CA-94-2124-6-3AK (D.S.C. Aug. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
73 F.3d 357, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40381, 1995 WL 761055, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-h-hoff-v-angel-wilson-president-third-worl-ca3-1995.