William H. Ferguson v. Michael C. Samberg, Warden
This text of 819 F.2d 1137 (William H. Ferguson v. Michael C. Samberg, Warden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
819 F.2d 1137
Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William H. FERGUSON, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael C. SAMBERG, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-6529.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted March 27, 1987.
Decided May 22, 1987.
Before HALL and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.
William H. Ferguson, appellant pro se.
William W. Muse, Assistant Attorney General, for appellee.
PER CURIAM:
A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit. Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of the district court. Ferguson v. Samberg, C/A No. 86-383-R (E.D.Va., Dec. 31, 1986).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
819 F.2d 1137, 1987 U.S. App. LEXIS 6568, 1987 WL 36089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-h-ferguson-v-michael-c-samberg-warden-ca4-1987.