William H. Chapman v. Ralph W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio Penitentiary

Sixth Circuit

William H. Chapman v. Ralph W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio Penitentiary

261 F.2d 838

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

DecidedDecember 17, 1958

Docket13546

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 261 F.2d 838 (William H. Chapman v. Ralph W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William H. Chapman v. Ralph W. Alvis, as Warden, Ohio Penitentiary, 261 F.2d 838 (6th Cir. 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a denial of an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court, has been heard and considered upon the oral argument and briefs of the petitioner and attorneys for both parties and upon the record in the case; and it appearing that the petitioner has made no showing of any error in the order of the District Judge, and that Judge Cecil reached an entirely correct result;

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This appeal from a denial of an application for a writ of habeas corpus in the United States District Court, has been heard and considered upon the oral argument and briefs of the petitioner and attorneys for both parties and upon the record in the case; and it appearing that the petitioner has made no showing of any error in the order of the District Judge, and that Judge Cecil reached an entirely correct result;

The order of the District Court is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

261 F.2d 838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-h-chapman-v-ralph-w-alvis-as-warden-ohio-penitentiary-ca6-1958.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack