William Grace v. E. Harris

Eighth Circuit

William Grace v. E. Harris

334 F. App'x 791

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedOctober 23, 2009

Docket08-2478

StatusUnpublished

This text of 334 F. App'x 791 (William Grace v. E. Harris) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Grace v. E. Harris, 334 F. App'x 791 (8th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE EIGHTH CIRCUIT ___________

No. 08-2478 ___________

William Grace, Sr., * * Appellant, * * Appeal from the United States v. * District Court for the Eastern * District of Missouri. E. Harris, Nurse; Susan Singer, Doctor; * Nurse Jones; Eugene Stubblefield, * [UNPUBLISHED] Individually and as Superintendent of * the Division of Corrections City of * St. Louis, * * Appellees. * ___________

Submitted: October 23, 2009 Filed: October 23, 2009 ___________

Before BYE, BOWMAN, and BENTON, Circuit Judges. ___________

PER CURIAM.

Missouri inmate William Grace, Sr., appeals the district court’s1 adverse grant of summary judgment in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. Upon de novo review of the record, see Roe v. Crawford, 514 F.3d 789, 793 (8th Cir.), cert. denied, 129 S. Ct. 109 (2008), we agree with the district court that summary judgment was warranted.

1 The Honorable Carol E. Jackson, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Missouri. Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B. We also deny Grace’s motion for appointment of counsel and appellees’ motion to dismiss. _______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI