William Gerber v. Roderick Hickman, Warden

Ninth Circuit

William Gerber v. Roderick Hickman, Warden

273 F.3d 843, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12599, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10100, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25920

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided December 4, 2001·No. 00-16494·Published

Opinion

273 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 2001)

WILLIAM GERBER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RODERICK HICKMAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee,

No. 00-16494
D.C. No. CV-99-01315-FCD

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed December 4, 2001

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

273 F.3d 843 (9th Cir. 2001)

WILLIAM GERBER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
RODERICK HICKMAN, Warden, Defendant-Appellee,

No. 00-16494
D.C. No. CV-99-01315-FCD

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

Filed December 4, 2001

Before: MARY M. SCHROEDER, Chief Judge.

ORDER

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused regular active judges of this court, it is ordered that this case be reheard by the en banc court pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to this court or any district court of the Ninth Circuit, except to the extent adopted by the en banc court.

William Gerber v. Roderick Hickman, Warden, 273 F.3d 843, 2001 Daily Journal DAR 12599, 2001 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10100, 2001 U.S. App. LEXIS 25920 (9th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

273 F.3d 843 (William Gerber v. Roderick Hickman, Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related