William Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities, Inc., Doing Business as Guidance Associates

Second Circuit

William Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities, Inc., Doing Business as Guidance Associates

95 F.3d 3, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24137

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit

DecidedSeptember 13, 1996

Docket1133

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 95 F.3d 3 (William Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities, Inc., Doing Business as Guidance Associates) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Gasperini v. The Center for Humanities, Inc., Doing Business as Guidance Associates, 95 F.3d 3, 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 24137 (2d Cir. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

95 F.3d 3

William GASPERINI, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
The CENTER FOR HUMANITIES, INC., doing business as Guidance
Associates, Defendant-Appellant.

No. 1133, Dockets 94-7753(L), 94-7823.

United States Court of Appeals,
Second Circuit.

Argued March 8, 1995.
Decided Sept. 13, 1996.

Francis A. Montbach, New York City (Bigham Englar Jones & Houston, New York City, on the brief) for Appellant Center for Humanities, Inc.

Samuel A. Abady, New York City (Jonathan S. Abady, David N. Mair, Abady Luttati Kaiser Saurborn & Mair, P.C., New York City, on the brief), for Appellee William Gasperini.

Before: MAHONEY, WALKER, and CALABRESI, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

In accordance with the decision of the Supreme Court in Gasperini v. Center for Humanities, --- U.S. ----, 116 S.Ct. 2211, 135 L.Ed.2d 659 (1996), vacating and remanding the case to us, we remand the case to the District Court for further proceedings in conformity with the opinion of the Supreme Court.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI