William Garmella v. Murray American Energy, Inc.

CourtWest Virginia Supreme Court
DecidedApril 5, 2023
Docket21-0571
StatusPublished

This text of William Garmella v. Murray American Energy, Inc. (William Garmella v. Murray American Energy, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering West Virginia Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Garmella v. Murray American Energy, Inc., (W. Va. 2023).

Opinion

FILED April 5, 2023 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS OF WEST VIRGINIA

STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA

SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS

WILLIAM GARAMELLA, Claimant Below, Petitioner

vs.) No. 21-0571 (BOR Appeal No. 2056323) (Claim No. 2019022787)

MURRAY AMERICAN ENERGY, INC., Employer Below, Respondent

MEMORANDUM DECISION Petitioner William Garamella, by Counsel J. Thomas Greene Jr., appeals the decision of the West Virginia Workers’ Compensation Board of Review (“Board of Review”). Murray American Energy, Inc., by Counsel Aimee M. Stern, filed a timely response.

The issues on appeal are medical and temporary total disability benefits. The claims administrator denied authorization of physical therapy and a consultation with Adam Tune, M.D., on July 7, 2020. On August 7, 2020, the claims administrator closed the claim for temporary total disability benefits. The Workers’ Compensation Office of Judges (“Office of Judges”) affirmed the decisions in its January 29, 2021, Order. The Order was affirmed by the Board of Review on June 16, 2021.

The Court has carefully reviewed the records, written arguments, and appendices contained in the briefs, and the case is mature for consideration. The facts and legal arguments are adequately presented, and the decisional process would not be significantly aided by oral argument. Upon consideration of the standard of review, the briefs, and the record presented, the Court finds no substantial question of law and no prejudicial error. For these reasons, a memorandum decision is appropriate under Rule 21 of the Rules of Appellate Procedure.

The standard of review applicable to this Court’s consideration of workers’ compensation appeals has been set out under W. Va. Code § 23-5-15, in relevant part, as follows:

(c) In reviewing a decision of the Board of Review, the Supreme Court of Appeals shall consider the record provided by the board and give deference to the board’s findings, reasoning, and conclusions . . . .

1 (d) If the decision of the board represents an affirmation of a prior ruling by both the commission and the Office of Judges that was entered on the same issue in the same claim, the decision of the board may be reversed or modified by the Supreme Court of Appeals only if the decision is in clear violation of constitutional or statutory provision, is clearly the result of erroneous conclusions of law, or is based upon the board’s material misstatement or mischaracterization of particular components of the evidentiary record. The court may not conduct a de novo reweighing of the evidentiary record . . . .

See Hammons v. W. Va. Off. of Ins. Comm’r, 235 W. Va. 577, 582-83, 775 S.E.2d 458, 463-64 (2015). As we previously recognized in Justice v. West Virginia Office Insurance Commission, 230 W. Va. 80, 83, 736 S.E.2d 80, 83 (2012), we apply a de novo standard of review to questions of law arising in the context of decisions issued by the Board. See also Davies v. W. Va. Off. of Ins. Comm’r, 227 W. Va. 330, 334, 708 S.E.2d 524, 528 (2011).

Mr. Garamella, a coal miner, injured his abdomen on April 27, 2019, while pulling mesh from under a rail car. A treatment note from Wheeling Hospital Emergency Room that day indicates Mr. Garamella presented with abdominal pain. He reported that he was at work when he felt a popping sensation in his lower abdomen. Jatinder Singh, M.D., diagnosed musculoskeletal and abdominal pain. In a treatment note, C. Clark Milton, M.D., noted that Mr. Garamella was seen in the emergency room that day and was evaluated for acute appendicitis, which was not found. Mr. Garamella was treated for an abdominal groin strain.

Mr. Garamella was treated at Hudson Premier Physical Therapy for right hip strain and strain of the adductor muscle, fascia, and tendon of the right thigh on May 8, 2019. On May 9, 2019, the claim was held compensable for strain of the muscle, fascia, and tendon of the abdomen. Temporary total disability benefits were granted from April 28, 2019, through May 15, 2019.

In a June 4, 2019, treatment note, Dr. Milton noted that Mr. Garamella continued physical therapy for groin and lower abdominal pain. Mr. Garamella reported improvement in his range of motion. Dr. Milton’s impressions were subjective improvement in range of motion and resolution of gastrointestinal symptoms. Dr. Milton opined that Mr. Garamella could return to work on June 17, 2019. Temporary total disability benefits were suspended on June 17, 2019, because Mr. Garamella was released to return to work.

Prasadarao Mukkamala, M.D., performed an Independent Medical Evaluation on June 17, 2019, in which he found that Mr. Garamella had reached maximum medical improvement for his abdominal strain and needed no further treatment. He assessed 0% whole person impairment. The claim was closed for temporary total disability benefits on July 16, 2019.

A January 9, 2020, treatment note from Wheeling Hospital Emergency Room indicates Mr. Garamella was seen after lifting a six gallon barrel at work and pulling his right groin. He reported that he had pulled his right groin in the past. He was diagnosed with right groin strain and left hydrocele. An ultrasound was performed that day and showed normal testicles with a small amount of complex fluid in the left scrotal sac. 2 In a January 10, 2020, treatment note, Ross Tennant, N.P., treated Mr. Garamella for pain radiating to the right testicle. Mr. Garamella noted that he had a previous right groin strain as a result of an occupational injury. Mr. Tennant diagnosed right hip adductor muscle strain and recommended physical therapy. Mr. Garamella was treated at Hudson Premier Physical Therapy on January 14, 2020. The plan was for sessions three times a week for four weeks. The claim was reopened for temporary total disability benefits on January 14, 2020. A right hip x-ray was performed on January 17, 2020, for a groin injury the previous Thursday while Mr. Garamella was carrying something heavy. The impression was no acute abnormalities.

In a February 7, 2020, treatment note, Mr. Tennant stated that the treatment with physical therapy had improved Mr. Garamella’s pain, though he still had some pain with repetitive activity. The diagnosis was right hip abductor muscle strain, and it was noted that Mr. Garamella was unable to return to work. Mr. Garamella returned on February 14, 2020, and stated that he had increased right groin pain since his physical therapy had been advancing. Mr. Tennant stated that Mr. Garamella could return to work on February 17, 2020, with the restrictions of no lifting, pushing, or pulling over ten pounds. On February 28, 2020, Mr. Garamella returned and stated that his right groin pain was worse than it had ever been. Mr. Tennant diagnosed right hip abductor muscle strain and lumbar strain with radiculopathy. It was noted that there had been no relief provided by physical therapy. Mr. Tennant opined that the pain may be the result of a radicular back issue and recommended physical therapy. Lumbar x-rays taken that day showed mild degenerative changes. Mr. Tennant recommended an MRI and opined that Mr. Garamella was not able to return to work at that time.

A lumbar MRI was performed on April 3, 2020, and revealed a chronic left L5-S1 paracentral disc herniation that could compromise the left S1 nerve root and a mild disc bulge and small annular tear at L4-5, but there were no specific findings to explain the right lower extremity radiculopathy.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Gary E. Hammons v. W. Va. Ofc. of Insurance Comm./A & R Transport, etc.
775 S.E.2d 458 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2015)
Davies v. Wv Office of the Insurance Commission, 35550 (w.va. 4-1-2011)
708 S.E.2d 524 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2011)
Justice v. West Virginia Office Insurance Commission
736 S.E.2d 80 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
William Garmella v. Murray American Energy, Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-garmella-v-murray-american-energy-inc-wva-2023.