William G. Young & Co. v. United States

U.S. Customs Court

William G. Young & Co. v. United States

40 Cust. Ct. 685

CourtUnited States Customs Court

DecidedFebruary 4, 1958

DocketReap. Dec. 9064; Entry Nos. 29088; 29089; 29090

StatusPublished

This text of 40 Cust. Ct. 685 (William G. Young & Co. v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Customs Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William G. Young & Co. v. United States, 40 Cust. Ct. 685 (cusc 1958).

Pincite

Opinion

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the cotton Corduroy Ladies Jackets involved in the above ap[686]*686peals for reappraisement, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the Country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at U. S. $12.40 per dozen, net packed.

It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for said merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

It is further stipulated that these cases may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the cotton corduroy ladies’ jackets here involved, and that such value was $12.40 per dozen, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Rao, Judge:

These appeals for reappraisement have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto:

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between Counsel for the respective parties, subject to the approval of the Court, that at the time of exportation of the cotton Corduroy Ladies Jackets involved in the above ap[686]*686peals for reappraisement, such or similar merchandise was freely offered for sale to all purchasers in the principal markets of the Country from which exported, in the usual wholesale quantities and in the ordinary course of trade for exportation to the United States at U. S. $12.40 per dozen, net packed.

It is further stipulated and agreed that there was no higher foreign value for said merchandise at the time of exportation thereof.

It is further stipulated that these cases may be submitted for decision on the foregoing stipulation.

On the agreed facts I find the export value, as that value is defined in section 402 (d) of the Tariff Act of 1930, to be the proper basis for the determination of the value of the cotton corduroy ladies’ jackets here involved, and that such value was $12.40 per dozen, net packed.

Judgment will be entered accordingly.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

40 Cust. Ct. 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-g-young-co-v-united-states-cusc-1958.