William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employee's Defined Ben. Pension Trust v. United States

930 F.2d 919, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14202, 1991 WL 54898
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedApril 12, 1991
Docket90-2014
StatusUnpublished

This text of 930 F.2d 919 (William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employee's Defined Ben. Pension Trust v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William G. Wilcox, D.O., P.C. Employee's Defined Ben. Pension Trust v. United States, 930 F.2d 919, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14202, 1991 WL 54898 (6th Cir. 1991).

Opinion

930 F.2d 919

Unpublished Disposition
NOTICE: Sixth Circuit Rule 24(c) states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Sixth Circuit.
WILLIAM G. WILCOX, D.O., P.C. EMPLOYEE'S DEFINED BENEFIT
PENSION TRUST, D.O., William Wilcox, D.O., P.C.,
Plaintiffs Counterclaim
Defendants-Appellants Cross-Appellees,
v.
UNITED STATES of America, Defendant Counterclaim
Plaintiff-Appellee Cross-Appellant,
William G. Wilcox, Counterclaim Defendant-Appellant Cross-Appellee,
Rubenstein, Isaacs, Bordman & Lax Corporation, Counterclaim Defendant.

No. 90-2014.

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 12, 1991.

Before KENNEDY, NATHANIEL R. JONES and DAVID A. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

ORDER

The government seeks dismissal of this appeal on the ground that the amended judgment appealed from is not a final judgment. Alternatively, the government requests that the appeal be held in abeyance pending a remand to the district court and entry of a final judgment. Appellants recognize that the amended judgment is not final and request a stay of this appeal rather than dismissal.

In the absence of a final order, this court generally lacks jurisdiction to consider an appeal. Oak Construction Co. v. Huron Cement Co., 475 F.2d 1220, 1221 (6th Cir.1973) (per curiam). Generally, the finality requirement must be met as of the date the notice of appeal is filed. Haskell v. Washington Township, 891 F.2d 132, 133 (6th Cir.1989) (order). Upon consideration, we conclude that the amended judgment appealed from in this case is not a final judgment.

It therefore is ORDERED that this appeal is dismissed without prejudice to any rights the parties may have to bring an appeal after entry of a final judgment.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Oak Construction Company v. Huron Cement Company
475 F.2d 1220 (Sixth Circuit, 1973)
Haskell v. Washington Township
891 F.2d 132 (Sixth Circuit, 1989)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
930 F.2d 919, 1991 U.S. App. LEXIS 14202, 1991 WL 54898, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-g-wilcox-do-pc-employees-defined-ben-pension-trust-v-ca6-1991.