William G. Jameson v. Tana Wood
This text of 73 F.3d 369 (William G. Jameson v. Tana Wood) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
73 F.3d 369
NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel.
William G. JAMESON, Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Tana WOOD, Respondent-Appellee.
No. 95-35842.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Submitted Dec. 19, 1995.*
Decided Dec. 29, 1995.
Before: SNEED, TROTT and HAWKINS, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM**
We affirm the district court's dismissal without prejudice of Washington state prisoner William G. Jameson's 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 action in light of his failure to comply with the court's order requiring him to file an amended complaint in a timely manner. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b); Ferdik v. Bonzelet, 963 F.2d 1258, 1260 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 113 S.Ct. 321 (1992).
AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
73 F.3d 369, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 40769, 1995 WL 765980, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-g-jameson-v-tana-wood-ca9-1995.