William Fred Cameron v. Locke T. Clifford North Carolina Attorney General Warden of New Port State Penitentiary

Fourth Circuit

William Fred Cameron v. Locke T. Clifford North Carolina Attorney General Warden of New Port State Penitentiary

21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15918, 1994 WL 83737

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 11, 1994

Docket93-7269

StatusPublished

This text of 21 F.3d 421 (William Fred Cameron v. Locke T. Clifford North Carolina Attorney General Warden of New Port State Penitentiary) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Fred Cameron v. Locke T. Clifford North Carolina Attorney General Warden of New Port State Penitentiary, 21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15918, 1994 WL 83737 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

21 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William Fred CAMERON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Locke T. CLIFFORD; North Carolina Attorney General; Warden
of New Port State Penitentiary, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7269.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-505-2)

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cameron v. Clifford, No. CA-93-505-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

21 F.3d 421
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

William Fred CAMERON, Plaintiff Appellant,
v.
Locke T. CLIFFORD; North Carolina Attorney General; Warden
of New Port State Penitentiary, Defendants Appellees.

No. 93-7269.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Feb. 17, 1994.
Decided March 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Norwood Carlton Tilley, Jr., District Judge. (CA-93-505-2)

Before RUSSELL, MURNAGHAN, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Cameron v. Clifford, No. CA-93-505-2 (M.D.N.C. Sept. 28, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

21 F.3d 421, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 15918, 1994 WL 83737, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-fred-cameron-v-locke-t-clifford-north-caro-ca4-1994.