William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard
Opinion
Opinion issued June 27, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals
For The
First District of Texas
to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the ordered findings of fact and conclusions of law on or before September 14, 2021. Despite the Court’s order, no supplemental clerk’s record was filed.
However, on November 4, 2022, appellee, Lisa Howard, filed an “affidavit”
with the Clerk of this Court representing that she had “received the full amount of outstanding child support and medical supported arrearages owed” by appellant and that the parties had entered “into a settlement agreement resolving all pending issues between the parties.” We construe the affidavit as a motion to dismiss the appeal as moot.
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). The motion does not include a certificate of conference stating that appellee conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer, with appellant regarding the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party has expressed opposition to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court reinstates the appeal to the Court’s active docket, grants the motion, and dismisses the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f). We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM
Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard (William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.