William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard
This text of William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard (William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Opinion issued June 27, 2023
In The
Court of Appeals For The
First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-19-00713-CV ——————————— WILLIAM FORSSBERG, Appellant V. LISA HOWARD, Appellee
On Appeal from the 507th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Case No. 2015-75176
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Appellant, William Forssberg, filed a notice of appeal from the trial court’s
August 20, 2019 order in this suit to modify the parent-child relationship. On August
24, 2021, the appeal was abated, and the Court remanded the case to the trial court
to enter findings of fact and conclusions of law. The trial court clerk was directed to prepare a supplemental clerk’s record containing the ordered findings of fact and
conclusions of law on or before September 14, 2021. Despite the Court’s order, no
supplemental clerk’s record was filed.
However, on November 4, 2022, appellee, Lisa Howard, filed an “affidavit”
with the Clerk of this Court representing that she had “received the full amount of
outstanding child support and medical supported arrearages owed” by appellant and
that the parties had entered “into a settlement agreement resolving all pending issues
between the parties.” We construe the affidavit as a motion to dismiss the appeal as
moot.
No other party has filed a notice of appeal, and no opinion has issued. See
TEX. R. APP. P. 42.1(a)(1), (c). The motion does not include a certificate of
conference stating that appellee conferred, or made a reasonable attempt to confer,
with appellant regarding the relief requested in the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P.
10.1(a)(5). However, more than ten days have passed, and no party has expressed
opposition to the motion. See TEX. R. APP. P. 10.3(a)(2).
Accordingly, the Court reinstates the appeal to the Court’s active docket,
grants the motion, and dismisses the appeal as moot. See TEX. R. APP. P. 43.2(f).
We dismiss any other pending motions as moot.
PER CURIAM Panel consists of Chief Justice Adams and Justices Guerra and Farris.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Forssberg v. Lisa Howard, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-forssberg-v-lisa-howard-texapp-2023.