William Forrest Morgan v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 28, 2022·No. 22-0935·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D22-0935

WILLIAM FORREST MORGAN, Petitioner, v.

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

September 28, 2022

PER CURIAM.

The Court dismisses the petition for writ of habeas corpus as unauthorized. See Logan v. State, 846 So. 2d 472 (Fla. 2003) (holding that, generally, a criminal defendant cannot proceed pro se while represented by counsel).

KELSEY, JAY, and M.K. THOMAS, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

William Forrest Morgan, pro se, Petitioner. Ashley Moody, Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Forrest Morgan v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2022).

William Forrest Morgan v. State of Florida (William Forrest Morgan v. State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Logan v. State
846 So. 2d 472 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2003)