William F. Adams v. Autherine J. Lucy and Polly Anne Myers

228 F.2d 619
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 1, 1956
Docket15839_1
StatusPublished
Cited by16 cases

This text of 228 F.2d 619 (William F. Adams v. Autherine J. Lucy and Polly Anne Myers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William F. Adams v. Autherine J. Lucy and Polly Anne Myers, 228 F.2d 619 (5th Cir. 1956).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Brought by appellees, plaintiffs below, for themselves and all other negroes similarly situated, against William F. Adams, Dean of Admissions of the University of Alabama, charging that he had denied them the equal protection of the laws guaranteed to them under the Fourteenth amendment, in that he had refused to admit them to the University of Alabama solely on account of their race and color, the suit was for a declaratory judgment and an injunction.

In a well considered opinion 1 dealing adequately with and disposing correctly of the issues joined, and upon findings of fact, which the record fully supports, and conclusions of law as fully supported by the authorities cited, the district judge determined 2 that plaintiffs were entitled *620 to the decree they sought and entered judgment 3 accordingly.

Upon the considerations advanced and the reasons given by the district judge in his opinion, with which we find ourselves in complete agreement, the judgment is affirmed.

1

. Lucy v. Adams, D.C., 134 F.Supp. 235, 239.

2

. “Plaintiffs are entitled to a decree enjoining the defendant, William F. Adams, Ms servants, agents, assistants and employees, and those who might aid, abet, and act in concert with him, from denying the plaintiffs and others similarly sit *620 uated the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study thereat,- solely on account of their race and color.

“Á decree will, accordingly, be entered for the plaintiffs.”
3

. “Judgment Upon Trial of Case on the Merits

“Pursuant to the Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law this day filed in this cause,
“It is ordered, adjudged and decreed as follows:
“1. That the defendant, William F. Adams, his servants, agents, assistants and employees, and those who might aid, abet, and act in concert with him, are hereby permanently enjoined and restrained from denying the plaintiffs and others similarly situated the right to enroll in the University of Alabama and pursue courses of study thereat, solely on account of their race or color.”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Knight v. State of Ala.
787 F. Supp. 1030 (N.D. Alabama, 1991)
United States v. State of Alabama
628 F. Supp. 1137 (N.D. Alabama, 1985)
Hoots v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania
639 F.2d 972 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Hoots v. Pennsylvania
639 F.2d 972 (Third Circuit, 1981)
Whitfield v. Oliver
399 F. Supp. 348 (M.D. Alabama, 1975)
Franklin v. Parker
223 F. Supp. 724 (M.D. Alabama, 1963)
Meredith v. Fair
298 F.2d 696 (Fifth Circuit, 1962)
Holmes v. Danner
191 F. Supp. 394 (M.D. Georgia, 1961)
Orleans Parish School Board v. Earl Benjamin Bush
242 F.2d 156 (Fifth Circuit, 1957)
Davis v. COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD OF PRINCE EDWARD CTY., VA.
142 F. Supp. 616 (E.D. Virginia, 1956)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
228 F.2d 619, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-f-adams-v-autherine-j-lucy-and-polly-anne-myers-ca5-1956.