William Everette Razor v. State

• Court: Court of Appeals of Texas
• Decided: January 21, 2015
• Docket: 03-14-00379-CR
• Status: Published

Opinion

ACCEPTED 03-14-00379-CR 3838951 THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/21/2015 9:51:46 AM JEFFREY D. KYLE CLERK NO. 03-14-00379-CR

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FILED IN 3rd COURT OF APPEALS THIRD COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS AT AUSTIN, TEXAS 1/21/2015 2:58:46 PM JEFFREY D. KYLE Clerk **************** WILLIAM EVERETTE RAZOR VS. THE STATE OF TEXAS **************** ON APPEAL FROM THE 27th JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, TEXAS CAUSE NO. 70,483 **************** BRIEF FOR THE STATE **************** HENRY GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P.O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 (254) 933-5215 / Fax (254) 933-5704 DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

ATTORNEYS FOR THE STATE TABLE OF CONTENTS

Table of Authorities ................................................................................................................. ii

Appellant’s Brief ......................................................................................................................... 1

Prayer ............................................................................................................................................ 2

Certificate of Compliance with Rule 9 ............................................................................... 2

Certificate of Service ............................................................................................................... 3

i TABLE OF AUTHORITIES

Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 87 S.Ct. 1396 (1967) ................................................................................................... 1

Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969) ....................................................................................................... 1

ii APPELLANT'S BRIEF

After a review of the record, the Appellant's counsel concludes that the

appeal is frivolous and that there are no arguable points of error (Appellant’s

Brief, pp. 1, 7).

Wherefore, Premises Considered, the State of Texas prays that the

decision of the Trial Court be affirmed, Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87

S.Ct. 1396 (1967); Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Cr.App.1969).

1 PRAYER

WHEREFORE, PREMISES CONSIDERED, and since no reversible

error is shown, the State respectfully prays that this Court affirm the

conviction.

Respectfully submitted,

HENRY L. GARZA DISTRICT ATTORNEY 27TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT

/S/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 Bar I.D. # 15200000 (254) 933-5215 / Fax (254) 933-5704 DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us

CERTIFICATE OF COMPLIANCE WITH RULE 9

This is to certify that the State’s Brief is in compliance with Rule 9 of the

Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure and that portion which must be included

under Rule 9.4(i)(1) contains 369 words.

/S/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney

2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE

This is to certify that a true and correct copy of the State's Brief has

been sent to the attorney of record, Gary E. Prust, by e-service to

gary@prustlaw.com, on this the 21st day of January, 2015.

/S/ Bob D. Odom BOB D. ODOM Assistant District Attorney P. O. Box 540 Belton, Texas 76513 Bar I.D. # 15200000 (254) 933-5215 / Fax (254) 933-5704 DistrictAttorney@co.bell.tx.us