William Everett Ellwood, Jr. v. Robert A. Harleston, Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution, the Attorney General for the State of Maryland

917 F.2d 1301, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19716, 1990 WL 171335
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 8, 1990
Docket90-7095
StatusUnpublished

This text of 917 F.2d 1301 (William Everett Ellwood, Jr. v. Robert A. Harleston, Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution, the Attorney General for the State of Maryland) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Everett Ellwood, Jr. v. Robert A. Harleston, Warden of Eastern Correctional Institution, the Attorney General for the State of Maryland, 917 F.2d 1301, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19716, 1990 WL 171335 (4th Cir. 1990).

Opinion

917 F.2d 1301
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William Everett ELLWOOD, JR., Petitioner-Appellant,
v.
Robert A. HARLESTON, Warden of Eastern Correctional
Institution, the Attorney General for the State of
Maryland, Respondents-Appellees.

No. 90-7095.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted Oct. 1, 1990.
Decided Nov. 8, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-90-59-HAR)

William Everett Ellwood, Jr., appellant pro se.

Mary Jennifer Landis, Assistant Attorney General, Baltimore, Md., for appellees.

D.Md.

DISMISSED.

Before DONALD RUSSELL and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge.

PER CURIAM:

William Everett Ellwood, Jr. seeks to appeal the district court's order refusing habeas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court. Ellwood v. Harleston, CA-90-59-HAR (D.Md. July 12, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Bepex Corporation v. Stouffer Foods Corporation
917 F.2d 1301 (Fourth Circuit, 1990)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
917 F.2d 1301, 1990 U.S. App. LEXIS 19716, 1990 WL 171335, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-everett-ellwood-jr-v-robert-a-harleston-wa-ca4-1990.