William Eugene Murray v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)
Opinion
MEMORANDUM DECISION Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), FILED this Memorandum Decision shall not be Nov 15 2019, 9:04 am
regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the purpose of establishing CLERK Indiana Supreme Court
the defense of res judicata, collateral Court of Appeals and Tax Court
estoppel, or the law of the case.
ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLEE Ana M. Quirk Curtis T. Hill, Jr. Muncie, Indiana Attorney General of Indiana Marjorie Lawyer-Smith Deputy Attorney General Indianapolis, Indiana
IN THE
COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA
William Eugene Murray, November 15, 2019 Appellant-Defendant, Court of Appeals Case No.
19A-CR-1364
v. Appeal from the Delaware Circuit Court
State of Indiana, The Honorable Thomas A. Appellee-Plaintiff Cannon, Jr., Judge Trial Court Cause No. 18C05-1610-F5-174
Baker, Judge.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1364 | November 15, 2019 Page 1 of 2
[1] This opinion is being handed down in tandem with a companion opinion in
Case Number 19A-CR-1350, and the issues raised by William Murray in both
appeals are identical. Pursuant to our analysis in that case, we affirm.
Kirsch, J., and Crone, J., concur.
Court of Appeals of Indiana | Memorandum Decision 19A-CR-1364 | November 15, 2019 Page 2 of 2
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Eugene Murray v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.) (William Eugene Murray v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.