William Eugene Monday, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, William Eugene Monday, Jr., and Florence S. Monday v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue

252 F.2d 789, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1010, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 20, 1958
Docket13283
StatusPublished

This text of 252 F.2d 789 (William Eugene Monday, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, William Eugene Monday, Jr., and Florence S. Monday v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William Eugene Monday, Jr. v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, William Eugene Monday, Jr., and Florence S. Monday v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, 252 F.2d 789, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1010, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999 (6th Cir. 1958).

Opinion

252 F.2d 789

William Eugene MONDAY, Jr., Petitioner,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.
William Eugene MONDAY, Jr., and Florence S. MONDAY, Petitioners,
v.
COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent.

No. 13282.

No. 13283.

United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit.

February 20, 1958.

Petition to Review Decision of the Tax Court of the United States.

Wm. P. O'Neil, Howard F. Jarvis, Elliott D. Adams, John M. Thornberg, and McAfee Lee, Knoxville, Tenn., for petitioners.

Charles K. Rice, Nelson P. Rose, Ellis N. Slack, Lee A. Jackson, A. F. Prescott, Fred E. Youngman, John M. Morawski and Carolyn R. Just, Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Before MARTIN and McALLISTER, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The Court having considered the record, the briefs and the oral argument of the parties upon the petitions to review the decisions of the Tax Court herein, and it appearing that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of the Tax Court and that the findings are not in any respect clearly erroneous (Dougherty v. Commissioner, 6 Cir., 1954, 216 F.2d 110);

It is ordered, upon the findings of fact and the well reasoned opinion of the Tax Court, 1957, ___ T.C. ___, that the decisions of the Tax Court are hereby affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
252 F.2d 789, 1 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 1010, 1958 U.S. App. LEXIS 5999, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-eugene-monday-jr-v-commissioner-of-internal-revenue-william-ca6-1958.