William Edward Sterling v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 20, 2012·No. 13-12-00135-CR·Published

Opinion

NUMBER 13-12-00135-CR

COURT OF APPEALS

THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS

CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG ____________________________________________________________

WILLIAM EDWARD STERLING, Appellant,

v.

THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee. ____________________________________________________________

On Appeal from the 24th District Court of Victoria County, Texas. ____________________________________________________________

MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Rodriguez, Garza, and Vela Memorandum Opinion Per Curiam

Appellant, William Edward Sterling, pro se, has filed a motion to dismiss his appeal

because he no longer desires to prosecute it. See TEX. R. APP. P. 42.2(a). Without

passing on the merits of the case, we grant the motion to dismiss pursuant to Texas Rule

of Appellate Procedure 42.2(a) and dismiss the appeal. Having dismissed the appeal at

appellant's request, no motion for rehearing will be entertained, and our mandate will

issue forthwith. PER CURIAM

Do not publish. TEX. R. APP. P. 47.2(b). Delivered and filed the 20th day of December, 2012.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William Edward Sterling v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2012).

William Edward Sterling v. State (William Edward Sterling v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.