WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN v. State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida

WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN v. State of Florida

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 1, 2016

Docket16-0466

StatusPublished

This text of WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN v. State of Florida (WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN v. State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2016).

Pincite

Opinion

IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

WILLIAM EARL DUNCAN, NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND Petitioner, DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED

v. CASE NO. 1D16-0466

STATE OF FLORIDA,

Respondent. ___________________________/

Opinion filed June 1, 2016.

Petition Alleging Ineffective Assistance of Appellate Counsel -- Original Jurisdiction.

William Earl Duncan, pro se, Petitioner.

Pamela Jo Bondi, Attorney General, and Giselle D. Lylen, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

PER CURIAM.

The petition alleging ineffective assistance of appellate counsel is denied on the

merits.

ROWE, KELSEY, and JAY, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI