William Earl Cunningham v. Aaron Root
Opinion
V.
William Earl Cunningham, an inmate in the Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division, filed suit against Aaron Root for violation of state law and the Eighth Amendment's prohibition against cruel and unusual punishment. U.S. Const. amend. VIII. Root answered and moved to dismiss the claim as frivolous pursuant to Chapter 14 of the Texas Civil Practices and Remedies Code. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. §§ 14.001-.014 (Vernon 2002). Subsequently, the trial court dismissed the suit as frivolous.
The record before this court does not demonstrate Cunningham complied with the requirement of section 14.004 to file an affidavit relating to previous filings, but does contain evidence of other filings by Cunningham. See Tex. Civ. Prac. & Rem. Code Ann. § 14.004 (Vernon 2002). Accordingly, we hold the trial court did not abuse its discretion in dismissing his suit. See White v. State, 37 S.W.3d 562, 565 (Tex. App.--Beaumont 2001, no pet.).
AFFIRMED.
PER CURIAM
Submitted on January 26, 2005
Opinion Delivered February 3, 2005
Before McKeithen, C.J., Kreger, and Gaultney, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
William Earl Cunningham v. Aaron Root (William Earl Cunningham v. Aaron Root) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.