William E. Hafner v. United States of America. Nick Pizzuti v. United States

211 F.2d 405
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1953
Docket4667_1
StatusPublished

This text of 211 F.2d 405 (William E. Hafner v. United States of America. Nick Pizzuti v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
William E. Hafner v. United States of America. Nick Pizzuti v. United States, 211 F.2d 405 (10th Cir. 1953).

Opinion

211 F.2d 405

William E. HAFNER
v.
UNITED STATES of America.
Nick PIZZUTI
v.
UNITED STATES of America.

No. 4666.

No. 4667.

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit.

December 9, 1953.

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Colorado.

S. Philip Cabibi, Pueblo, Colo., for appellants.

Charles S. Vigil, U. S. Atty., Denver, Colo., for appellee.

Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and BRATTON and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

Judgments reversed and remanded on authority of United States of America v. Five Gambling Devices, etc., D.C., 119 F.Supp. 641; United States of America v. Roscoe Denmark, D.C., 119 F.Supp. 647, and United States of America v. Milton H. Braun, D.C., 119 F. Supp. 646, on December 9, 1953, without written opinion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Denmark
119 F. Supp. 647 (S.D. Georgia, 1953)
United States v. Braun
119 F. Supp. 646 (S.D. Georgia, 1953)
United States v. 5 Gambling Devices
119 F. Supp. 641 (N.D. Georgia, 1952)
Hafner v. United States
211 F.2d 405 (Tenth Circuit, 1953)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
211 F.2d 405, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-e-hafner-v-united-states-of-america-nick-pizzuti-v-united-ca10-1953.