William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida, No. 71-1670 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New Yorkm 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

446 F.2d 642
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided August 17, 1971·No. 642·Published

Opinion

446 F.2d 642

William E. GODWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Curtis PHELPS and the City of Okeechobee, Florida,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 71-1670 Summary Calendar.*
*Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises Inc.,
v.
Citizens Casualty Company of New York et alM 5 Cir. 1970,
431 F.2d 409, Part I.

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

Aug. 17, 1971.

F. Malcolm Cunningham, Cunningham & Cunningham West Palm Beach, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Edward Curren, Okeechobee, Fla., Carlton, Brennan & McAliley, John T. Brennan, Fort Pierce, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Before COLEMAN, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida, No. 71-1670 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New Yorkm 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I, 446 F.2d 642 (5th Cir. 1971).

446 F.2d 642 (William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida, No. 71-1670 Summary Calendar. Rule 18, 5 Cir. See Isbell Enterprises Inc. v. Citizens Casualty Company of New Yorkm 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related