William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida

Fifth Circuit

William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida

446 F.2d 642, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8469

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

DecidedAugust 17, 1971

Docket71-1670

StatusPublished

This text of 446 F.2d 642 (William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William E. Godwin v. Curtis Phelps and the City of Okeechobee, Florida, 446 F.2d 642, 1971 U.S. App. LEXIS 8469 (5th Cir. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

446 F.2d 642

William E. GODWIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Curtis PHELPS and the City of Okeechobee, Florida, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 71-1670 Summary Calendar.*

United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit.

August 17, 1971.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; C. Clyde Atkins, Judge.

F. Malcolm Cunningham, Cunningham & Cunningham, West Palm Beach, Fla., for plaintiff-appellant.

J. Edward Curren, Okeechobee, Fla., Carlton, Brennan & McAliley, John T. Brennan, Fort Pierce, Fla., for defendants-appellees.

Before COLEMAN, SIMPSON and MORGAN, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Affirmed. See Local Rule 21.1

Notes:

*

Rule 18, 5 Cir.; See Isbell Enterprises Inc., v. Citizens Casualty Company of New York et al., 5 Cir. 1970, 431 F.2d 409, Part I

1

See NLRB v. Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, 5 Cir. 1970, 430 F.2d 966

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI