William E. Bynes v. State of Florida
This text of William E. Bynes v. State of Florida (William E. Bynes v. State of Florida) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FOURTH DISTRICT
WILLIAM E. BYNES, Appellant,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.
No. 4D2024-2711
[February 12, 2025]
Appeal of order denying rule 3.800 motion from the Circuit Court for the Fifteenth Judicial Circuit, Palm Beach County; Howard K. Coates, Jr., Judge; L.T. Case No. 502001CF000912A.
William E. Bynes, Everglades, pro se.
No appearance required for appellee.
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed. See Sustakoski v. State, 992 So. 2d 306 (Fla. 4th DCA 2008) (the requisite predicate convictions necessary to impose a violent career criminal sentence need not be submitted to a jury); see also Lee v. State, 383 So. 3d 816, 817 (Fla. 4th DCA 2024). 1
KLINGENSMITH, C.J., CONNER and FORST, JJ., concur.
* * *
Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing.
1 Similar to Lee, we acknowledge that appellant has argued the Court’s decision in
Erlinger v. United States, 602 U.S. 821 (2024) may be dispositive in the instant case.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William E. Bynes v. State of Florida, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-e-bynes-v-state-of-florida-fladistctapp-2025.