William E. Baker, Alias Jake Gray v. U. S. Board of Parole

Fifth Circuit

William E. Baker, Alias Jake Gray v. U. S. Board of Parole

337 F.2d 622

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided November 2, 1964·No. 21276·Published

Opinion

337 F.2d 622

William E. BAKER, Alias Jake Gray, Appellant,
v.
U. S. BOARD OF PAROLE, Appellee.

No. 21276.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 2, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; Bryan Simpson, Judge.

William E. Baker, pro se.

Charles S. Carrere, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., Middle District of Florida, for appellee.

Before JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and ESTES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The district court held that this action was premature and that the court lacked jurisdiction to grant any relief. Finding ourselves likeminded, the district court's judgment is

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

337 F.2d 622

William E. BAKER, Alias Jake Gray, Appellant,
v.
U. S. BOARD OF PAROLE, Appellee.

No. 21276.

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit.

November 2, 1964.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida; Bryan Simpson, Judge.

William E. Baker, pro se.

Charles S. Carrere, Asst. U. S. Atty., Jacksonville, Fla., Edward F. Boardman, U. S. Atty., Middle District of Florida, for appellee.

Before JONES and GEWIN, Circuit Judges, and ESTES, District Judge.

PER CURIAM:

The district court held that this action was premature and that the court lacked jurisdiction to grant any relief. Finding ourselves likeminded, the district court's judgment is

Affirmed.

William E. Baker, Alias Jake Gray v. U. S. Board of Parole, 337 F.2d 622 (5th Cir. 1964).

Pincite

337 F.2d 622 (William E. Baker, Alias Jake Gray v. U. S. Board of Parole) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.