William Dorton v. State
This text of William Dorton v. State (William Dorton v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM DORTON,
Appellant,
v. Case No. 5D18-649
STATE OF FLORIDA,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Opinion filed June 1, 2018
3.850 Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Dan Traver, Judge.
Gary Schwartz, Orlando, for Appellant.
No Appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
William Dorton appeals the summary denial of his motion for postconviction relief
filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We affirm.
Dorton was charged with attempted felony murder. He was found not guilty by
reason of insanity and committed to the custody of the Department of Children and
Families. He subsequently filed a motion for postconviction relief, alleging ineffective
assistance of counsel. The trial court considered the matter on the merits and denied the
motion. Rule 3.850(a) plainly applies only to “claims for relief from judgment or release
from custody by a person who has been tried and found guilty or has entered a plea of
guilty or nolo contendere.” Because Dorton was found not guilty by reason of insanity,
he has no claim for relief under rule 3.850.
AFFIRMED.
ORFINGER, EVANDER and EISNAUGLE, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
William Dorton v. State, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-dorton-v-state-fladistctapp-2018.