WILLIAM DOE, KATRINA DOE AND BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. vs U.C., FATHER AND IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF M.Q.C., A CHILD
Opinion
IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF FLORIDA FIFTH DISTRICT
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE MOTION FOR REHEARING AND DISPOSITION THEREOF IF FILED
WILLIAM DOE, KATRINA DOE AND BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC.,
Appellants,
v. Case Nos. 5D21-2716 5D21-2717
LT Case No. 2018-DR-005697-O
U.C., FATHER OF AND IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF M.Q.C., A CHILD,
Appellee.
________________________________/
Decision filed December 12, 2022
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County, Julie H. O'Kane, Judge.
Erica T. Healey and Jeanne T. Tate, of Jeanne T. Tate, P.A., Tampa, for Appellants, William Doe and Katrina Doe.
Stephen H. Price, of Cramer, Price, de Armas, P.A., Orlando, for Appellant, Bethany Christian Services of Florida, Inc.
Scott L. Robbins, Elizabeth D. Burchell and Joshua G. Sheridan, of Busciglio Sheridan Shoeb, P.A., Tampa, for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
COHEN, NARDELLA and WOZNIAK, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
WILLIAM DOE, KATRINA DOE AND BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. vs U.C., FATHER AND IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF M.Q.C., A CHILD (WILLIAM DOE, KATRINA DOE AND BETHANY CHRISTIAN SERVICES OF FLORIDA, INC. vs U.C., FATHER AND IN RE: THE ADOPTION OF M.Q.C., A CHILD) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.