William Dewayne Shadell v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

Eighth Circuit

William Dewayne Shadell v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services

52 F.3d 330, 1995 WL 231329

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedApril 20, 1995

Docket94-3756

StatusPublished

This text of 52 F.3d 330 (William Dewayne Shadell v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

William Dewayne Shadell v. Donna E. Shalala, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, 52 F.3d 330, 1995 WL 231329 (8th Cir. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

52 F.3d 330
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

William Dewayne SHADELL, Appellant,
v.
Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services, Appellee.

No. 94-3756EA.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Apr. 12, 1995.
Filed: Apr. 20, 1995.

Before FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

William Dewayne Shadell appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental income benefits. After a careful review of the record and the briefs, we conclude Shadell's arguments lack merit. We are satisfied the ALJ's hypothetical question to the vocational expert described Shadell's impairments with reasonable precision. We are also satisfied the testimony of the vocational expert provides substantial evidence that there are significant numbers of jobs in the national economy Shadell is capable of performing. Because an extended discussion of the controlling law would serve no useful purpose, we affirm without an opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

52 F.3d 330
NOTICE: Eighth Circuit Rule 28A(k) governs citation of unpublished opinions and provides that no party may cite an opinion not intended for publication unless the cases are related by identity between the parties or the causes of action.

William Dewayne SHADELL, Appellant,
v.
Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of the Department of Health and
Human Services, Appellee.

No. 94-3756EA.

United States Court of Appeals,
Eighth Circuit.

Submitted: Apr. 12, 1995.
Filed: Apr. 20, 1995.

Before FAGG and BOWMAN, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,* District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

William Dewayne Shadell appeals the denial of his application for disability insurance benefits and supplemental income benefits. After a careful review of the record and the briefs, we conclude Shadell's arguments lack merit. We are satisfied the ALJ's hypothetical question to the vocational expert described Shadell's impairments with reasonable precision. We are also satisfied the testimony of the vocational expert provides substantial evidence that there are significant numbers of jobs in the national economy Shadell is capable of performing. Because an extended discussion of the controlling law would serve no useful purpose, we affirm without an opinion. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

*

The Honorable Mark W. Bennett, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Iowa, sitting by designation

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

52 F.3d 330, 1995 WL 231329, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-dewayne-shadell-v-donna-e-shalala-secretar-ca8-1995.