William D. Zack v. W.J. Thompson, Warden, Fci Morgantown
This text of 59 F.3d 169 (William D. Zack v. W.J. Thompson, Warden, Fci Morgantown) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
59 F.3d 169
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.
William D. ZACK, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.J. THOMPSON, Warden, FCI Morgantown, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 95-6343.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted May 18, 1995.
Decided June 26, 1995.
Before NIEMEYER and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit Judge. William D. Zack, Appellant Pro Se.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2241 (1988) petition. We have reviewed the record and the district court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Zack v. Thompson, No. CA-94-179-2 (N.D.W. Va. Jan. 30 & Feb. 14, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
59 F.3d 169, 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 23119, 1995 WL 376162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/william-d-zack-v-wj-thompson-warden-fci-morgantown-ca4-1995.